廉价智能手机性价比大比拼

The Best Smartphone for Less Than $100

廉价智能手机性价比大比拼

Not everyone can afford an Apple iPhone or top of the line Samsung Galaxy phone. Thankfully, smartphones are becoming more affordable.

非所有人都买得起苹果(Apple)的iPhone或三星(Samsung) Galaxy系列的顶级手机。不过谢天谢地，智能手机正变得越来越便宜。

An increasing number of manufacturers now sell phones in India for less than $100.

越来越多的手机生产商目前在印度销售价格在100美元以下的手机。

As a result, smartphone sales and usage are increasing in the country. Mobile data usage in India increased by 92% between December 2011 to December 2012, according to a study by Nokia Siemens Networks.

其结果是，印度智能手机销量和使用均呈现增长。诺基亚西门子通信公司(Nokia Siemens Networks)的研究显示，2011年12月至2012年12月印度移动数据使用量增长了92%。

But which smartphone offers the best value for your $100? We compared three models: the Nokia Asha 501, the Samsung Galaxy Star and the Micromax A34.

但相对于100美元的价位，哪些智能手机最物有所值？我们比较了三款机型：诺基亚Asha 501、三星Galaxy Star和印度本土厂商Micromax推出的A34。

Operating System: The Samsung Galaxy Star runs on the Jelly Bean operating system, the latest version Google Inc.'s Android. Meanwhile, the Micromax A34 is powered by the two-year-old, but still popular, Android Gingerbread. The Asha 501 uses Nokia's proprietary Asha platform.

操作系统： 三星Galaxy Star运行谷歌(Google Inc.)安卓(Android)系统的最新版本Jelly Bean操作系统。同时，Micromax A34搭载的是推出已有两年但仍然流行的安卓Gingerbread操作系统。Asha 501采用了诺基亚专有的Asha平台。

Advantage: Samsung.

占优势者：三星。

Screen Size: The Micromax A34 has the largest screen, 3.9 inches compared to the Nokia's 2.97 inches and the Samsung's 3 inch screen.

屏幕尺寸： Micromax A34屏幕最大，为3.9英寸。诺基亚2.97英寸，三星3英寸。

Advantage: Micromax, but the Samsung has the highest resolution.

占优势者：Micromax，但三星屏幕分辨率最高。

Camera: The Nokia Asha 501's 3.2 megapixel camera, far better than the 2 megapixel camera of both the Samsung Galaxy Star and Micromax A34. None of the models have a front-facing camera for video chatting.

摄像头： 诺基亚Asha 501摄像头为320万像素，远高于三星Galaxy Star和Micromax A34的200万像素。三款机型均未配备用于视频聊天的前置摄像头。

Advantage: Nokia.

占优势者：诺基亚。

Storage: The Samsung Galaxy Star and Nokia Asha 501 come with a 4 gigabyte memory card, while Micromax A34 comes with 165 megabytes of internal memory. All three handsets accept up to a 32 gigabyte memory card.

存储： 三星Galaxy Star和诺基亚Asha 501配有4G存储卡，Micromax A34配有165M内存。三款机型均兼容最高32G的存储卡。

Advantage: Tie.

占优势者：不分胜负。

Weight: The Micromax A34 weighs in at a relatively svelte 85 grams compared to the Nokia Asha 501, 91 grams, and the comparatively chunky Samsung Galaxy Star, 96 grams.

重量： Micromax A34重85克，略轻于诺基亚Asha 501的91克。三星Galaxy Star相对较重，为96克。

Advantage: Micromax.

占优势者：Micromax。

Battery life: The Nokia Asha 501 can go 1152 hours, 48 days, on a single charge, a level of battery life not seen since the candy bar phone. The Samsung Galaxy Star and Micromax A34 promise 320 hours and 120 hours battery power respectively.

电池寿命： 诺基亚Asha 501一次充电可持续1152 个小时（48天），这是直板手机时代之后从未有过的电池寿命水平。三星Galaxy Star和Micromax A34的电池寿命分别为320小时和120小时。

Advantage: Nokia, and it's not even close.

占优势者：Nokia，而且领先优势极大。

Content: The Nokia Asha 501 and Micromax A34 come with a host of preloaded content including music, apps and games. The Samsung Galaxy Star is more like your typical smartphone, requiring you to download and, in some cases, pay for apps from Samsung's store or from Google Play.

内容： 诺基亚Asha 501和Micromax A34配有预装的音乐、应用和游戏等内容。三星Galaxy Star更类似通常的智能手机，需要自行从三星的应用商店或Google Play下载应用，有时还需付费。

Advantage: Micromax, you have free content and access to an app store.

占优势者：Micromax，配有免费内容，还可访问应用商店。

Price: The Samsung Galaxy Star and Nokia Asha both retail for 5, 000-rupees (US$80.66). The Micromax A34 costs 4399 rupees.

价格： 三星Galaxy Star和诺基亚Asha的零售价格均为5,000印度卢比（合80.66美元）。Micromax A34的价格为4399印度卢比。

Advantage: Micromax.

占优势者：Micromax。

本文来源：https://www.2haoxitong.net/k/doc/4430a135f18583d04964592e.html